𝗧𝗼𝗽 𝟭𝟬 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 – 𝗢𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱

 

𝐋𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤 𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠: 𝐈𝐧-𝐇𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐥 𝐍𝐨𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝟏𝟑𝟐 𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭-𝐀𝐭𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐁𝐒𝐀, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟑

 
A significant judgment by the Supreme Court of India, delivered on 𝐎𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟑𝟏, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓, has clarified the scope of 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭-𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐞 under the newly enacted 𝐁𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐲𝐚 𝐒𝐚𝐤𝐬𝐡𝐲𝐚 𝐀𝐝𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐲𝐚𝐦 (𝐁𝐒𝐀), 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟑. The apex court, in the suo motu case titled In Re: Summoning Advocates Who Give Legal Opinion or Represent Parties During Investigation of Cases and Related Issues, held that 𝐢𝐧-𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐥 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝟏𝟑𝟐 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐒𝐀.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/landmark-ruling-in-house-counsel-covered-section-132-priv-kattungal-aegaf

This ruling has profound implications for the corporate legal landscape, creating a clear distinction between the protections afforded to independent practicing advocates and those functioning as salaried employees of a corporation.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭’𝐬 𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧

The three-judge Bench, comprising 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐞𝐟 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐁. 𝐑. 𝐆𝐚𝐯𝐚𝐢, 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐊. 𝐕𝐢𝐧𝐨𝐝 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐧 (𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐣𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭), 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐍. 𝐕. 𝐀𝐧𝐣𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐚, issued a set of crucial directions primarily to curb the arbitrary summoning of practicing advocates by investigative agencies. While doing so, the Court also addressed the status of in-house counsel:

• 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝟏𝟑𝟐: The Court explicitly stated that 𝐢𝐧-𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐥—as full-time salaried employees—𝐝𝐨 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐲 𝐚𝐬 ‘𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐨𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬’ for the purpose of the absolute professional privilege granted under Section 132 of the BSA, 2023. Section 132 protects a lawyer from being compelled to disclose communications made to them by or on behalf of their client in the course and for the purpose of their professional engagement.
• 𝐑𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐞: The distinction appears to stem from the fact that in-house counsel are not seen as advocates "𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭𝐬" in the traditional sense, which is a common prerequisite for statutory protections afforded to the Bar. Their primary role is often administrative and advisory within the employer-employee relationship, rather than being an independent practitioner.

  #LegalPrivilege #InHouseCounsel #SupremeCourtIndia   #BSA2023   #BharatiyaSakshyaAdhiniyam #UAELegalJobs#KeralaLawyers #BarCouncilKerala #CalicutLawCollege #DistrictAndSessionsCourt,#KeralaLawAlumni, #GulfLegalNetwork